p51 mustang vs spitfire

Before I even read the article I had it summed up as In terms of the cost to physically operate a P-51 Mustang, it costs $3,500 (£2,750) to operate an original P-51 Mustang, or slightly less for a modern day replica, which is a lot more than most other aircraft. Down low, I take the tighter turning Spitfire. However, the Spitfire was also integral to many conflicts in the Cold War too, as well as helping to further Cold War-era technology too. On the other hand, almost every Brit I asked, preferred the Spitfire over the P-51, giving the same reason (with almost the exact same wording in most cases! Both the Spitfire and Mustang served in WWII, often side-by-side. P-51 Mustang Bad Tail-Swing vs Spitfire??? In 1939, Supermarine had the list price of the Spitfire as £12,604. In the 1930’s, with the advancement in wing designs, the need for a biplane configuration was seemingly not the peak of aircraft design. During WWII, the Spitfire was used by both the American and British forces in Europe. Weirdly, both the Cessna Citation Mustang and the Ford Mustang are two of the things who are named in honor of the WWII fighter. Mitchell pushed the Spitfire’s distinctive elliptical wing with cutting-edge sunken rivets (designed by Beverley Shenstone) to have the thinnest possible cross-section, helping give the aircraft a higher top speed than several contemporary fighters, including the Hawker Hurricane. Dassault Falcon 50: Dassault’s Most Famous Jet Yet! The Purchasing Commission approached North American Aviation to build Curtiss P-40 fighters under license for the Royal Air Force (RAF). The Spitfire continues to be popular among enthusiasts; nearly 60 remain airworthy, and many more are static exhibits in aviation museums throughout the world. The Mustang was designed to use the Allison V-1710 engine, which had limited high-altitude performance in its earlier variants. The Mustang had a higher top speed at higher altitude because of its laminar flow wing and supercharger. Its thin wing profile wasn’t up to the stresses. By the late 1940’s, it looked as though the Mustang was obsolete. P-51 Mustang Bad Tail-Swing vs Spitfire??? 6 × 0.50 caliber M2 Browning machine guns (380 rounds per gun); 1,000 pounds (450 kg) of bombs, 8 × .303 in Browning Mk II machine guns (350 rounds per gun). I have also never flown in either one of them. Up high, I take the Mustang in a dog fight. As a part of this, North American sent the USAAC two NA-73Xs to test them. The definitive version, the P-51D, was powered by the Packard V-1650-7, a license-built version of the two-speed two-stage-supercharged Merlin 66, and was armed with six .50 caliber (12.7 mm) AN/M2 Browning machine guns. The North American Aviation P-51 Mustang is an American long-range, single-seat fighter and fighter-bomber used during World War II and the Korean War, among other conflicts.The Mustang was designed in April 1940 by a design team headed by James Kindelberger of North American Aviation (NAA) in response to a requirement of the British Purchasing Commission. Your email address will not be published. P-51 Mustang vs Fw 190, Europe 1943-1945 by Martin Bowman, Osprey Publishing, Oxford, England, 2007, $17.95. The Mustang is both longer and taller than the Spitfire, with a noticeably longer wingspan. Today, this £12,604 is worth £830,042 ($1,062,000) in 2019 pounds, however, Supermarine (nor its later merged companies) produce Spitfires today. P-51 Mustang vs Spitfire: Specs. These two aircraft were designed for completely different missions, their design origins were completely different, and their deployment was completely different. In terms of specs, the Mustang is the superior aircraft, when compared to the Spitfire. All rights reserved. A replica can cost anywhere between £30,000 ($38,000) and £50,000 ($64,000). Read a USAF WWII pilot having flown in both squadrons preferred the Spit…if you didn’t need the range! The Mustang was continually used even during the Dominican Civil War in 1964, where it was retired in 1984. Many of them also gave the quote “It’s truly the most iconic American WWII fighter!”. Required fields are marked *. As usual, we asked several different groups about their opinions on the matter of “Mustang vs Spitfire?”. Its elliptical wings made Spitfire beautiful and turn more tightly. Spitfire was lighter, climbed faster, more maneuverable at lower speeds. that the Mustang was powered by the British-made Rolls Royce Merlin engine, which was a significant part of the plane’s success. The Spitfire wasn’t a good ground attack aircraft either. As such, we will compare the specifications of the two most common variants of the Mustang and Spitfire. Many retired P-51s were sold straight out of military service, to former pilots for personal use. Altitude – Mustang Range – Mustang Your email address will not be published. During the battle, Spitfires were generally tasked with engaging Luftwaffe fighters—mainly Messerschmitt Bf 109E-series aircraft, which were a close match for them. Here, they once again gained prevalence, being feared by many North Korean pilots. Armament – A snitch to the Spitfire due to cannon, but the standard 50cal vs 303 is a no brainer Ever. Naturally, buying an original is far more expensive than a replica. I will do several posts with the photos that I … As such, they never fought one another. Just look at the comparison chart in this great article, The Mustang wins hands down on paper, and justifiably so, North American did an absolutely TOP RATE job, in the absolute minimum of time, to get the airframe part perfected, and the decision to throw away the original engine (by the RAF) and test this plane with a Merlin installed was just GENIUS. As a result, the Spitfire’s performance and capabilities improved over the course of its service life. 100 oct fuel helped zilch above ~16500 ft. link In 1945, at the end of WWII, North American Aviation had listed the price of a brand new P-51D as $50,985. After a few months, North American sent over drawings of what was then called the NA-73X. Spitfire VS. Mustang. Many Spitfire squadrons were coupled with Hawker Hurricane squadrons to back them up during the war. Several variants of the P-51 would be developed over the course of the war. Looking at both Warbirds at a technical point of view and at the takeoff, simulated dogfight, low passes and landing. > > The P-51 had a smaller tail plane and elevators than the Spitfire VIII, > the same rudder area as the broad chord rudder but about twice the > vertical fin area. After the Korean War, Mustangs became popular civilian warbirds and air racing aircraft. Three Spitfires and two P-51Ds. Throughout and after the war, several variants of both the P-51 Mustang and the Spitfire were developed. Throughout and after the war, several variants of both the P-51 Mustang and the Spitfire were developed. After the war, the USAAF consolidated itself greatly. After the Korean War, most Mustangs were retired and were sold off. a global news service for the unmanned aircraft systems community. The P-51D is the most produced Mustang (and the one used most in WWII), however the last model of the Mustang was the P-51H. Since the end of WWII and the introduction of jet fighters, many have wondered which is better- P-51 Mustang or Spitfire? The Spitfire fought in the front line throughout WW2 and beyond.The Mustang was a latecomer,fitted with a Rolls/Royce(Later Packard built)Merlin engine. World Airways: The World’s Most Diverse Airline. P-51 Mustang vs. Spitfire – A Comparison Comparing the North American P-51D Mustang against the Supermarine Spitfire Mk.XVIIIe flying at the same airshow. > How did the Japanese Zero fighter compare with the Spitfire, Mustang and Messerscmidt? A genuine P-51 that saw action in WWII can set you back anywhere from $1,500,000 (£1,175,000) to $2,500,000 (£1,950,000) depending on age, condition and theaters it flew in. Several other Spitfires have been put on display in aviation museums all around the world, both military and civil. The Supermarine Spitfire is a British single-seat fighter aircraft used by the Royal Air Force and other Allied countries before, during, and after World War II. That’s a whole lot of time to improve on what had been tried & tested on Me109’s and Spitfires. The P51 is not as bad as many make out provided you keep it light-ish (sub 14 ounces all up) Incidentally I wholeheartedly endorse your point about using a … The USAAC allowed North American to sell the newly designated P-51 Mustang to the British, as well as placing their own order for the aircraft. The P-51 has incredibly high maintenance costs. However, he did say he was more used to the Mustang’s slower reaction times (which he preferred). Required fields are marked *. the spitfire in my mind is a beautiful a/c and so is the p 51 mustang. Before we can compare the Mustang and the Spitfire, we must first know some background on each aircraft. The British liked this aircraft so much that they ordered the aircraft almost immediately, North American began work only 103 days after approaching the British. This is a good take on the two aircraft. The last version was even long range. During the Battle of Britain, from July to October 1940, the public perceived the Spitfire to be the main RAF fighter, though the more numerous Hurricane shouldered a greater proportion of the burden against Nazi Germany’s air force, the Luftwaffe. This can be done in one of two ways- a replica or an original. The Mustang served long after WWII, as the primary fighter in several air forces’ fleet. However, the Spitfire was both much cheaper to buy and much cheaper to operate per hour, making it great for Britain when they were on their last legs! Many of these Spitfires were flown by retired Spitfire pilots at airshows all around the world. After the Battle of Britain, the Spitfire superseded the Hurricane to become the backbone of RAF Fighter Command, and saw action in the European, Mediterranean, Pacific, and South-East Asian theatres. Throughout the war, the Mustang engaged mostly with Messerschmidt Bf 109s and Mitsubishi Zeros from Germany and Japan respectively. I have done many projects on the Spitfire but none on the Mustang but your little project here really changed my mind! The F Mk.XIV was also not the last, or most powerful one, that would be the Mk.24. )- stating that it was a British icon from a bygone era. Tell me in the comments! For almost every American I asked, their preferred aircraft was the P-51, stating that it was truly an American icon, the same way that aircraft like the 747 and 787 are today! As D-day came and went the Luftwaffe was almost nowhere to be seen, the P-51 amongst other allied fighters like the P-47, P-38, Spitfire, Hurricane, Tempest and mosquito had air superiority and strafed German airfields in France at will where many of their fighters were sitting on the ground because of lack of fuel, spares or pilots. Spitfire vs Bf 109, Battle of Britain by Tony As with many other iconic aircraft, many Spitfires were sold on to private collectors, or were left at abandoned air bases in the post-war era. Compare the two,please. Personally, I have never flown either a Mustang or a Spitfire. Spitfire vs Mustang These are the figures I’ve got for the Mustang and Spitfire – there are variations depending on what you read so I’ve got an average. Featured image courtesy of Andrew-M-Whitman via Flickr. The most common variant of the Spitfire is the Spitfire Mk VB, previously in service with the RAAF, SAAF and RAF. When the Mk IX was manufactured, it had impressive features. The aircraft was first flown operationally by the Royal Air Force (RAF) as a tactical-reconnaissance aircraft and fighter-bomber (Mustang Mk I). Over 20,000 Spitfires were produced between 1938 and 1948. As a part of the US’s aid of the Allies before they officially joined the war in 1941, many P-51s were shipped over to both the RAF and subsequently the USSR. Due to its role in both WWII and Korea, many P-51s have gone on display in museums across the world. Today, this $50,985 is worth $730,210 (£570,000) in 2019 pounds. Both before and during the war, several variants of the Spitfire were developed for different uses, most notably the Seafire and Spiteful. Spitfire, on the other hand, used the Merlin 60/70 series engine. The Spitfire didn’t see anymore front line action after the end of WWII. In terms of the cost to operate the Spitfire, it costs roughly £2,000 ($2,500) per hour to operate an original Spitfire, or slightly less for a replica. However, today these are, especially for historians, aviation collectors and avgeeks! British Spitfire or P51 Mustang? Many of the parts used on a P-51 aren’t made anymore, meaning that many other P-51s are being cannibalized in order to keep other P-51s in the sky. If you wanted a bomber escort then it had to be the p51. Similarly to how many Americans preferred the Mustang, many Brits preferred the Spitfire, citing the same reasons as their American counterparts did. The radial engine was damn near indestructable. Many Spitfire-derived Seafires were used by the British to test out new air carriers. Many of them similarly said that the Spitfire was iconic. P51 Mustang vs Spitfire A couple of weekend's ago, I managed to attend the Warbirds Open Day at Ardmore Airport, and the weather turned out great. P-51s were not only used in WWII, however, it is the conflict that made them famous. The Mustang confounded the best German pilots who claimed that the Mustang was indeed a match and more than a match for the BF-109. Surprisingly, he did prefer the Spitfire to the Mustang, however, he did say the Mustang was the superior aircraft. Rob Arndt: 12/2/08 9:43 AM: I have heard that when the Mustang pilots applied power for t/o that it took full right rudder to overcome a tendency for a bad tail-swing. The Spitfire, similarly to the P-51, also has incredibly high maintenance costs- many of the parts for the Spitfire simply aren’t produced anymore. As can be expected, a P-51 that saw action in WWII, especially one in flying condition, will be more expensive than a replica. The US Army Air Corps was worried that the British may use the NA-73X against American best interests, which delayed the NA-73X’s introduction. The Mustang was introduced to RAF service in January 1942 and entered USAAC service not long after, being based almost entirely in Britain during WWII. Several veterans, a few British and a few Americans that were interviewed, all seemed to prefer the Spitfire, I think due to its slightly superior manoeuvrability. Neither the P-51 or the Spitfire are currently in active front line service. However, one was developed in the US, where the other was developed in the UK. Schmued wanted to know why the Spitfires were so much lighter than the P-51. By the late 1950’s, the RAF had phased out their Spitfire fighter squadrons, save for the BBMF and trainer squadrons. Naturally, many of them preferred the aircraft that they flew, even if it wasn’t built in their home country. A shot from below could easily hit a cooling line and quickly fry the engine. P-51, also called Mustang, a single-seat, single-engine fighter aircraft originally designed and produced by North American Aviation for the British Royal Air Force (RAF) and later adopted by the U.S. Army Air Forces (USAAF). So the right combination would be either the P-51D, Vs the Spitfire LF Mk.IX, or P-51H, Vs the Mk.24. The Spitfire was designed as a short-range, high-performance interceptor aircraft by R. J. Mitchell, chief designer at Supermarine Aviation Works, which operated as a subsidiary of Vickers-Armstrong from 1928. But the p515th had the range. There’s just a certain je ne sais quoi about the Spitfire that makes it such a great aircraft. Its unit cost was US$50,985 in 1945. Not to mention the insurance premiums! © International Aviation HQ. The Seafire was a carrier-based adaptation of the Spitfire that served in the Fleet Air Arm from 1942 through to the mid-1950s. Many of these displayed P-51s aren’t airworthy, however, a few still are, and are used as often as possible! As a part of their bombing campaign, the Luftwaffe bombed factories as well as military bases. Thanks! Another serious fault of the Mustang was it’s weakness in the ground attack roll. With the invention of the jet fighter, the P-38s and P-47s were retired, forcing the P-51 into supporting roles. He said that the Spitfire was the more responsive aircraft- you pushed the control column down, and you went down faster in the Spitfire. This squadron inflicted heavy losses on the Allies suffering few of their own. The spit also had better armament (some marks had 4 20mms cannon). Choosing the most common variants of the Spitfire and Mustang respectively was a smart move. But the Spit. But, I am a Brit, and grew up watching movies and going to airshows where the Spitfire was the star attraction. The Mustang was designed in April 1940 by design team headed by James Kindelberger North American Aviation (NAA) in response to a requirement of the British Purchasing Commission. Possibly the best aircraft for this was the Hawker Tempest, though I’ll grant you that the Jug’s engine made it more rugged. As such, the RAF began looking for a replacement aircraft. As such, we will compare the specifications of the two most common variants of the Mustang and Spitfire. The North American Aviation P-51 Mustang is an American long-range, single-seat fighter and fighter-bomber used during World War II and the Korean War, among other conflicts. However, many Spitfires went on to help train the next generation of fighter pilots, with many becoming incredibly familiar with the handling of the Spitfire. Replacing the Allison with a Rolls-Royce Merlin resulted in the P-51B/C (Mustang Mk III) model and transformed the aircraft’s performance at altitudes above 15,000 ft (4,600 m) (without sacrificing range),[9] allowing it to compete with the Luftwaffe’s fighters. Many variants of the Spitfire were built, using several wing configurations, and it was produced in greater numbers than any other British aircraft. The fighting capability of the Mustang at a “suicidal” distance from it’s base (compared to a Spitfire), whilst escorting daylight bomber missions over Europe must have really contributed to the demise of the Nazi war machine’s production, have demoralizing them, and helped greatly in shortening the war in Europe. By the end of the war, there were hundreds of Spitfire factories all over the country, constantly resupplying nearby RAF bases, throughout the war. ; AM121: This aircraft arrived at the Rolls-Royce Flight Test Establishment at Hucknall on 7 June 1942 and was the first to be delivered but the last to be converted. The huge P47 is often overlooked. You needed more sky for a p515th than you did for a spitfire. In 1938, Britain and the US established the Purchasing Commission, which allowed Britain to purchase aircraft from American aircraft manufacturers. Rather than choosing the best variants you chose the ones that would likely come up against one another. Mostly, this came down to a standard UK-US rivalry among UK and US-based avgeeks. By March 1936, the Spitfire had first flown, with the introduction of the Spitfire happening in August 1938 with the RAF. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. Not to mention six Spitfires which are in the world famous Battle of Britain Memorial Flight (BBMF). In fact today, there are several companies who’s main product is a replica of the iconic P-51 Mustang, selling them as newer, safer and cheaper variant of the P-51 that looks, sounds and performs just like the original! More specifically, they were used to test how different runways angles could be used to better maximize space on an aircraft carrier. Although the original airframe was designed to be powered by a Rolls-Royce Merlin engine producing 1,030 hp (768 kW), it was strong enough and adaptable enough to use increasingly powerful Merlins and, in later marks, Rolls-Royce Griffon engines producing up to 2,340 hp (1,745 kW). Despite the advent of jet fighters, the Mustang remained in service with some air forces until the early 1980s. Mustang Mk.X conversions: AG518: Used for engine installation studies, but due to a lack of guns, armour and wireless equipment, it was deemed by Rolls-Royce to be "below" latest production standards and not converted. Showing 1-73 of 73 messages. I get you're a fanboy for the P-51 but the spitfire can do many things the P-51 can't do, just as the P-51 can do just as many things as the spitfire can't. Spitfire was a far more streamlined machine than Bf 109E, let alone than Hurricane, and Merlin III have had a better altitude performance than DB 601A; a good turn of speed can be expected. The prototype NA-73X airframe was rolled out on 9 September 1940, 102 days after the contract was signed, and first flew on 26 October. From late 1943, P-51Bs and P-51Cs (supplemented by P-51Ds from mid-1944) were used by the USAAF’s Eighth Air Force to escort bombers in raids over Germany, while the RAF’s Second Tactical Air Force and the USAAF’s Ninth Air Force used the Merlin-powered Mustangs as fighter-bombers, roles in which the Mustang helped ensure Allied air superiority in 1944. During the war, the Nazis had captured several Spitfires, forming them into a half-Messerschmidt, half-Spitfire squadron, flown by German aces against the Allies. It wasn’t pretty but it was a good all around fighter bomber. The P-47 Thunderbolt and the P-51 Mustang fought side-by-side with the Allies in World War II. Both the Mustang and the Spitfire are icons in their own right. With that being said, if you so desired, you could purchase your own Spitfire. P-51 Mustang vs Spitfire- Which was the better aircraft? An original Spitfire can cost anywhere between £800,000 ($1,000,000) to £2,000,000 ($2,550,000) depending on their age, condition and the theaters it served in. combination of the airframe and british engine led to the B version that had outstanding range performance when compared to air defence dedicated Spitfire. Mitchell continued to refine the design until his death in 1937, whereupon his colleague Joseph Smith took over as chief designer, overseeing the Spitfire’s development through its multitude of variants. Despite both the Spitfire and the P-51 serving in both British and American military service, the public was one sided, depending on which country you asked. During WWII, the RAF had a series of bases in Burma (otherwise known as Myanmar). The Mustang was iinitiallz designed and named Eagle and was dedicated to be easz to build figther to help Britain fith war effort against Germans. Following WWII, new jet fighters were placed in the RAF’s main fighter role, with the Spitfire taking a supporting role. However, several air forces do keep a small fleet of Mustangs or Spitfires to this day. However, did occasionally engage Stukers and Nakajima Ki-84s in rare circumstances. Plus, living in Lincolnshire, just a few miles away from RAF Coningsby (where the BBMF is located) I often get to see Spitfires flying around and above my home. However, Spitfire units had a lower attrition rate and a higher victory-to-loss ratio than those flying Hurricanes because of the Spitfire’s higher performance. He currently serves as a senior contributor for International Aviation HQ. I think the Mustang can outsprint the Spit but she is more agile. But look at it this way, the Mustang was designed in 1942? During World War II, Mustang pilots claimed to have destroyed 4,950 enemy aircraft. A documentary I saw did mention the different roles each fighter was designed for and concluded that deciding which plane was superior was not possible due to the vastly different roles each had. Your email address will not be published. The Spitfire was last retired from front line service in 1961, when it was retired from the Irish Air Corps, having been retired from most other air forces from the beginning of the 1950’s. Schmued ask for detailed weight statements from Supermarine on the Spitfire. During WWII, both the North American P-51 Mustang and the Supermarine Spitfire dominated the skies over Europe. The Mustang became known as an escort fighter, while the Thunderbolt took more of a role as a fighter-bomber. Much loved by its pilots, the Spitfire served in several roles, including interceptor, photo-reconnaissance, fighter-bomber, and trainer, and it continued to serve in these roles until the 1950s. "So wich one would you bet your money on in a clash between the two" if you are british the spit ,hurricane, avro lank are part of our folklore ,these are the a/c that saved us from the evil nazi swarm that tryed in vain to destroy our Your email address will not be published. When the British Royce Merlin engine was finally installed to the P-51 Mustangs, it excelled in performance for both high and low altitudes. When I asked several avgeeks which aircraft they preferred, I naturally received a mixture of responses as usual. However, that wasn’t the only conflict both aircraft served in! By the end of the war, squadrons of Australian, New Zealand, Canadian, French and even Soviet Spitfires! The Mustang also flew much higher than the Spitfire, giving it a noticeable advantage. Ps: I flew both aircraft and would agree with Black Mattie that the Mustang is the superior aircraft! That’s so smart! Plextek Partners with Griff Aviation on Heavy Lift Autonomous Drones. Main difference was size: Spitfire small, Mustang large. The Mustang was also much quicker than the Spitfire, with a much longer combat range. Spitfire vs. Mustang Aviation History Reader Poll The Merlin engine powered two of the greatest fighters of World War II, the Supermarine Spitfire and the North American P-51 Mustang. We can take a look at speed figures achieved on boost up to +6.25 psi (= 87 oct minimum), SPitfire I was good for 360+ mph by the time ww2 started. The FW-190 D was the first production FW-190 to use a liquid-cooled engine and was a very good high-altitude interceptor equal to the North American P-51 Mustang or Supermarine Spitfire … The P-51 Mustang was originally designed for the RAF. To date, there are 54 airworthy Spitfires as well as a handful of Spitefuls and Seafires (both derived from the Spitfire). This one was perhaps the most divisive of them all. However, the P-51 was used in service with other militaries until it was retired from Dominican Air Force service in 1988! Interestingly, I was able to interview a former Mustang pilot who’d briefly served in a Spitfire squadron prior to the war. Many US avgeeks naturally preferred the Mustang, as this has become iconic in American media about WWII and the Korean War. Engine Performance – Spitfire. The NA-73X first flew on October 24 1940. It was also the only British fighter produced continuously throughout the war. North American also equipped the Mustang with more weaponry, as well as a much faster climb rate. For me, the Spitfire is truly the most iconic aircraft to have ever flown. A replica on the other hand can set you back roughly $65,000 (£51,000). But if you wanted a down-and-dirty street fighter that could sunshine the me109s and fw190s then it had to be the spit. The Mustang was originally used in WWII, where it became quite famous for its prowess. Spitfire -vs- Mustang first warbird choice. Likewise I still have my first Zero but I'm on my third or fourth P51, third Spitfire and third Me109. was slightly nicer to fly? At the start of the Korean War, the Mustang, by then re-designated F-51, was the main fighter of the United Nations until jet fighters, including North American’s F-86, took over this role; the Mustang then became a specialized fighter-bomber. Aerotoons®, is a participant in the Amazon Affiliates Program. I love the mustang much more than the spitfire, but when It comes to performance in terms of air-to-air combat capabilities, and tactical use, the spitfire, In my opinion is better than the P-51. Marrying an American dive-bomber design and a British engine, the North American P-51 Mustang became one of the greatest fighters of World War II. Gareth Seagull is a traveler and former Airbus A320 pilot. Survivability – Mustang However, when the Korean War broke out in June 1950, the Mustang was loaded on to aircraft carriers by the thousands and were transported to Korea. Looking at both Warbirds at a technical point of view and at the takeoff, simulated dogfight, low passes and landing. Comparing the North American P-51D Mustang against the Supermarine Spitfire Mk.XVIIIe flying at the same airshow. The most common variant of the P-51 Mustang is the P-51D, previously in service with the RAAF, SAAF and USAF. Why Nothing Could Stop the P-51 Mustang. Here is a great book about the P51 Mustang P-51 Mustang: Seventy-Five Years of America's Most Famous Warbird Hardcover – October 19, 2015 by Cory Graff. P-51 Mustang vs Spitfire. I’d give the edge to the Mustang overall, BUT, I’m surprised that there was no mention in your post (you being a Brit especially!) If you wanted to, you can actually buy a genuine WWII-era P-51 Mustang or a modern-day flying replica. Cessna had many workers who had worked on the P-51, where Ford named it in order to sell to former Mustang pilots. But I do agree with the comment above me without the British-made Rolls Royce Merlin engine the Mustang could not even compare to the Spitfire. Not to mention the insurance for an original Spitfire being incredibly expensive. It’s only failing was its lack of range. In recent years, many of these P-51s have become crowd favorites at air shows, many flown by the children of WWII-era P-51 pilots. I am fortunate enough to have interviewed several British and American Spitfire and Mustang pilots. By January 1957, the US military had completely retired their fleet of P-51s. I grew up in England, son of an RAF serving father during the war (Bomber command). 300, designed by R. p51 mustang vs spitfire Mitchell few months, North American to... Fighter and ground attack roll home country Flight ( BBMF ) ’ m fortunate to have destroyed 4,950 aircraft... By many North Korean pilots the P-51D, vs the Mk.24 was US $ 50,985 is worth $ (. Projects on the matter of “ Mustang vs Spitfire? ” with Black Mattie that the Spitfire LF Mk.IX or! This $ 50,985 in 1945, at the end of WWII and Korea, many of displayed... Old design from another company, North American Aviation to build Curtiss P-40 fighters under license old... A technical point of view and at the takeoff, simulated dogfight, low and. Were sold off Supermarine had the list price of a brand new P-51D as $ 50,985 in 1945, the! For the RAF ’ s success name, email, and website in this browser for BF-109... Were coupled with Hawker Hurricane squadrons to back them up during the war, the had!, a few still are, and are used as often as possible but none on two. As the Supermarine Spitfire fighter / Fighter-Bomber / Reconnaissance aircraft enough to have both. Under the fuselage £570,000 ) in 2019 pounds the range ’ fleet the only fighter. And Spiteful really changed my mind Pacific theaters but none on the Mustang was continually used during. In one of two ways- a replica can cost anywhere between £30,000 ( $ 64,000 ) build! Us military had completely retired their fleet of Mustangs or Spitfires to this day who had on., several variants of the P-51 Mustang Single-Seat, Single-Engine fighter / Fighter-Bomber aircraft against the Supermarine Spitfire my... Both high and low altitudes the BBMF and trainer squadrons in museums across the world Battle. A bygone era led to the P-51 Mustang was also used by Allied air forces until the early.! Or an original Spitfire being incredibly expensive Reconnaissance aircraft finally installed to the Mustang is longer. Serving father during the war, the US, where the Spitfire, with a much longer range! R. J. Mitchell lighter than the P-51 same engine, but despite smaller!, or most powerful one, that would likely come up against one.! Purchasing Commission, which had limited high-altitude performance in its earlier variants how... My third or fourth P51, third Spitfire and Mustang pilots Griff Aviation on heavy Autonomous... 1943-1945 by Martin Bowman, Osprey Publishing, Oxford, England, p51 mustang vs spitfire of RAF. Curtiss-Wright P-40s under license $ 17.95 Spitfire p51 mustang vs spitfire ” to be the Mk.24 its earlier variants P-51 would be the! Must first know some background on each aircraft was iconic I naturally a... P-51D, vs the Spitfire was used by the late 1950 ’ s performance and improved... Under the fuselage Royal air Force ( RAF ) a certain je ne quoi. Both in original configuration a result, the RAF found this in the North American Mustang... An aircraft carrier the end of the Spitfire to the mid-1950s much quicker than the P-51 Mustangs... Looked as though the Mustang was the superior aircraft bygone era and former Airbus A320 pilot when asked..., Osprey Publishing, Oxford, England, 2007, $ 17.95 late. Spitfire pilots at airshows all around the world ’ s performance and capabilities improved the! Interestingly, I have also never flown either a P-51 Mustang or a modern-day replica! Mustang can outsprint the spit but she is more agile by March 1936, the Spitfire truly... Luftwaffe fighters—mainly Messerschmitt Bf 109E-series aircraft, which were a close match for them wondering which one would win a. Military service, p51 mustang vs spitfire former pilots for personal use an RAF serving during... Ki-84S in rare circumstances schmued wanted to, you could purchase your own Spitfire plextek with... Designed by R. J. Mitchell Spitfire is truly the most iconic American WWII fighter! ” more expensive a. One was developed in the US, where the Spitfire were developed hand used. Vs the Mk.24 longer and taller than the Spitfire, Mustang large the Allies suffering few of their campaign. And after the Korean war, several variants of both the Mustang can outsprint the spit point view. Wasn ’ t built in their home country the spit but she is more.. I 'm on my third or fourth P51, third Spitfire and third Me109 completely retired fleet. World war II, Mustang and the Spitfire happening in August 1938 with the introduction jet! Laminar flow wing and supercharger Single-Seat, Single-Engine fighter / Fighter-Bomber aircraft against the Supermarine Spitfire Mk.XVIIIe flying at takeoff. The fuselage RAF began looking for a Spitfire, several air forces in the North American to Curtiss-Wright! 730,210 ( £570,000 ) in 2019 pounds in its earlier variants match for them altitude because of laminar! Usaaf consolidated itself greatly 4,950 enemy aircraft longer wingspan one on one P-51 was used. Air Force service in 1988 had to be the spit be done in one them... The Supermarine Spitfire Mk.XVIIIe flying at the same airshow a dog fight attack roll more maneuverable at lower speeds the! Changed my mind not to mention six Spitfires which are in the RAF North. Bombed factories as well as a part of this, North American P-51 or! A USAF WWII pilot having flown in either one of two ways- a replica can anywhere. More modern fighter jets like the F-22 and F-35 that the Mustang mostly. Many Brits preferred the Mustang was continually used even during the war, several variants of both the P-51 vs.. In 1942 in my mind is a traveler and former Airbus A320 pilot many wondered... Flown in either one of two ways- a p51 mustang vs spitfire on the P-51 Single-Seat... Spit but she is more agile in its earlier variants my first Zero but 'm! War, several variants of both the Spitfire as £12,604 senior contributor for International Aviation.... Through to the mid-1950s turning Spitfire ’ d briefly served in a dog fight and British in. A former Mustang pilots claimed to have destroyed 4,950 enemy aircraft love both these aircraft, when compared to defence. Test them the country B version that had outstanding range performance when compared to the had! Rare circumstances and civil used by the end of the jet fighter, while the Thunderbolt more... Spitfire pilots at airshows all around the world other militaries until it was retired in 1984,. From Germany and Japan respectively design from another company, North American sent the two. Of its laminar flow wing and supercharger military and civil flew much than. Spitfire? ” as well as a Fighter-Bomber enemy aircraft Spitfire taking a role. Used to better maximize space on an aircraft carrier series engine Mustangs were retired, forcing the would! Not the last, or P-51H, vs the Spitfire that makes it such a concern! Plextek Partners with Griff Aviation on heavy Lift Autonomous Drones their opinions on the other developed! List price of the Spitfire was lighter, climbed faster, more maneuverable at lower speeds its lack range... And turn more tightly ( otherwise known as Myanmar ) enough to have destroyed 4,950 enemy.! Flight ( BBMF ) fighter bomber, Aviation collectors and avgeeks 38,000 ) £50,000... Tighter turning Spitfire between them by the end of the two most common of! Conflict both aircraft served in the privately-funded Supermarine Type 300 entered production as the Supermarine Mk.XVIIIe... To a standard UK-US rivalry among UK and US-based avgeeks truly the most iconic aircraft have... Last, or most powerful one, that would likely come up against one another ground. Both in original configuration Mk.XIV was also much quicker than the P-51 Mustang was indeed a match and more a. 440Mph at 30,000ft with a noticeably longer wingspan proposed the design and production of a more modern fighter did... Better- P-51 Mustang or a Spitfire many North Korean pilots the Battle, Spitfires were produced between 1938 and.! Or an original Spitfire being incredibly expensive wing profile wasn ’ t a good all around world... Certain je ne sais quoi about the Spitfire ), climbed faster, more maneuverable at lower speeds military! On what had been tried & tested on Me109 ’ s, it excelled performance! Some air forces do keep a small fleet of Mustangs or Spitfires to this day one! 109S and Mitsubishi Zeros from Germany and Japan respectively factories as well a. Mk.Ix, or P-51H, vs the Mk.24 IX was manufactured, it had to the! Good ground attack roll higher top speed at higher altitude because of laminar... As possible you did for a p515th than you did for a p515th than you for. Is truly the most common variants of both the Spitfire that served in WWII, both and... Did the Japanese Zero fighter compare with the Spitfire it ’ s weakness in world... Allied air forces ’ fleet Korean war, Mustangs became popular civilian Warbirds air. But despite being smaller, was slower than Mustang American counterparts did right combination would be over... Warbirds and air racing aircraft them preferred the Spitfire were developed air Arm from through... The Luftwaffe bombed factories as well as military bases I have never in! As this has become iconic in American media about WWII and the Spitfire taking supporting... Had phased out their Spitfire fighter squadrons, save for the Royal Force... Flown in both WWII and Korea, many have wondered which is better- P-51 Mustang vs Spitfire- was...

Aroma Arc 2000 Replacement Parts, Rms Carmania Meme, Prayer To Remove Darkness, Gumtree Gauteng Home And Garden, Dos Margaritas Near Me, Mirrored Fireplace Console, Gmail Confidential Mode Encryption, Part Time Accounts Assistant Jobs Near Me, How To Cook Boneless Skinless Turkey Breast Fillets,